Should Huck Finn be read in Schools?
A popular controversy sweeping over the schools of America
is one that directly affects high school students: Should The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn be read in school? Parents and
administrators everywhere are deciding whether or not to ban this story from
entering the shelves of high schools and the fresh minds of young adults.
Others argue that the story should be taught, but without the use of the ‘n
word’ which makes an appearance 219 times. Many believe that this offensive
word should instead be replaced with a less derogatory term, such as ‘slave.’ Doing
so would be attempt to reject such a poor area of America’s history and respect
those who may still be affected by such language.
I, however, take on the opposite
viewpoint of these people. Censoring out the word won’t change anything about
the history of what it was like during Huck’s era, and it takes away an
opportunity for students to learn about such a time, despite the fact that it
may have been full of incorrect beliefs. High school students are provided with
the knowledge ahead of time that the ‘n word’ is a bad word and they are taught
to never say it, but for the most part, it is something they have heard in
their lives before. Replacement of the word or choosing to ban the story won’t
do anything but take away from their education.
Despite the fact that this book is
filled with improper grammar and racial slurs, it is a book that has been read
for decades. Banning it from high school reading lists would be an impractical
way to handle the problem. It would be a major literary loss for the
educational system as well. Despite the way that it is written, Huck Finn tells a remarkable story that
can teach so many things to young adults. It even brushes up on a number of
moral concepts, if you choose to look past the derogatory words. For example,
it does reveal the notion of friendship, especially between the characters of
Huck and Jim. This is seen in several parts of the story but one in particular
stuck out to me as I looked back. When Jim is afraid that Huck had died, and he
sees that he is all right, he exclaims, “Goodness gracious, is dat you Huck? En
you ain’ dead- you ain’ drownded- yous back agin? It’s too good for true,
honey, it’s too good for true.” (p.53). This shows how he cared for Huck by
reacting with the emotional composure of a mother or father to a son, showing
that Huck Finn is not strictly about
race, because it also reveals other concepts and themes.
While taking the book off of the
shelves would obviously be the worst- case scenario, taking the ‘n word’ out is
not much better. In her article, “Why is Slave Less Offensive?” Francine Pose
argues, “Nigger” and “Slave” are not synonyms by any stretch of the
imagination.” Huck didn’t look at Jim as a slave, and the ‘n word’ was a word
so frequently used during this time that it allows a window of opportunity to
teach students what this time period was like. In Toni Morrison’s “Intro to
Huck Finn,” she directly references this controversy by saying, “It struck me
as a purist yet elementary kind of censorship, designed to appease adults
rather than educate children. Amputate the problem, band-aid the solution.”
This statement is a perfect way of captioning the idea of cutting the ‘n word’
from the story. Taking out such a key word and replacing it with something else
won’t have the same effect as opposed to leaving the word in the story and
using as a learning opportunity.
Although in a controversy like
this, it is important to bring forward the arguments from the other side. Many
parents and some teachers are disgusted by the use of the ‘n word’ in the story
and believe that the repetition of it alone should be enough to require its
removal. While these people do have good intentions and mean well, they are
simply overlooking the drastic things that would happen if this story were to
become banned or altered. In her article regarding the dual life of literature,
Jane Smiley makes the comment, “My natural sentiments would be in favor of
talking it out, seeking the humanity behind the labels and helping students
experience that.” This idea holds together the basis for how we can take this
opportunity to have young adults read a book that gives a prime example of what
history was like during this poor part of our nation’s history. There are a number of times in the book when
we see Huck treat Jim with dignity, despite the derogatory terms uses to refer
to Jim. One example is when Huck decides to apologize to Jim for his prank,
saying, “It was fifteen minutes before I could work myself up to go and humble
myself to a nigger; but I done it and I warn’t ever sorry for it afterwards,
neither. I didn’t do him no more mean tricks, and wouldn’t done that one if I’d
a knowed it would make him feel that way.” (p. 55). This quote shows how Huck overlooked
the way that society saw Jim and treated him as somewhat of an equal. Even
though Huck was still racist at the end of the story, he evolves into a person
who discovers the dignity of all people.
What you, as a reader, can do to
help spread your voice is to make your opinion known. Although you should voice
your beliefs no matter which side you take, it is extremely important to keep Huck Finn uncensored and available for
high school literature classes. Our nation’s teachers are perfectly capable of
teaching this story in a way that will benefit the minds of young adults.
Without it, the American educational system will lose a remarkable piece of
work and several important teaching moments.
Citations:
Chadwick- Joshua,
Jocelyn. The Jim Dilemma: Reading Race in Huckleberry Finn. Jackson:
University Press of Mississippi, 1998.
Smiley, Jane. "Say It
Ain't So, Huck: Second Thoughts on Mark Twain's ‘Masterpiece’." Harper's
Magazine 292 (1996): 61-67.
Twain, Mark. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Edited by Shelley Fisher Fiskin; introduction
by Toni Morrison, afterword by Victor Doyno. New York: Oxford University Press,
1996.
Twain, Mark. The Adventures of
Huckleberry Finn. N.p.: David Widger, n.d. Web.
Prose, Francine. "Why Is 'Slave' Less
Offensive?" The New York Times. N.p., n.d. Web.
Smiley, Jane. "Literatures Dual Life." The
New York Times. N.p., n.d. Web.
This op-ed is very well constructed! Your organization is really good and you are a very eloquent writer. I agree completely with the points that you made when you said that censoring the book is not a very good option for how to handle the situation. You arguments were clear and backed up well with quotes. I really enjoyed you op-ed! :)
ReplyDelete*your
ReplyDelete